Comparison

Recompete vs Stotles

Both surface public contracts before they come up for re-tender. They are built for different markets, and for a large number of teams Stotles is the right answer. Here is the honest split.

Choose Stotles if
Choose Recompete if

Side by side

 RecompeteStotles
Primary marketContinental EU, 44 countriesUK & Ireland, with EU data
UK public sectornot coveredFind a Tender, Contracts Finder, PCS
Expiry provenance on each rowpublished vs derived, statednot exposed
Supplier-to-lot attributionlot vs notice scope, statednot exposed
Winnable before expiry12,498 framework call-offs flaggednot exposed
MCP / A2A interfaceboth, same capabilitiesweb app and integrations
Bid management workflowno — data onlyyes
Free tiercounts, aggregate value, window datesfree discovery tier available

Stotles figures reflect their publicly documented product and pricing as of August 2026 and may have changed since; check their site for current detail. Recompete figures are live from this corpus. Stotles is a trademark of its owner and is named here for comparison only.

Why continental coverage is harder than it looks

Germany, Sweden, Poland and the Netherlands publish an explicit contract end date. France, Spain and Italy usually do not — they publish a duration instead. A tool that only reads the end-date field sees barely a thousand French contracts. Deriving the expiry from a published start date plus a published duration recovers 35,116, and every recovered row is marked derived so it is never mistaken for a published fact.

That is the difference between covering the EU and covering the part of the EU that happens to fill in one field.

Start a free trial → · or read the measured coverage and limits

Recompete is paid by vendors for delivered leads, never for outcomes. No fee is contingent on winning a contract. Ranking is computed from published procurement data alone and is not influenced by who pays.